Re: git tag --no-merged?

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Feb 4, 2015, 21:27 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqq1tm5nz9l.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <54D26B7C.7020300@kdbg.org>

Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:

Show 6 quoted lines

> Am 04.02.2015 um 16:19 schrieb Peter Krefting:
>> Using "git branch --no-merged" I can get a list of branches that I have
>> that I haven't merged into my current branch.
>
> Assuming v2.0.0 is a tag, using "git branch --no-merged v2.0.0" you can
> see which branches haven't been merged into v2.0.0.

I think the request is a bit more involved than "Which one is not yet in v2.0.0?"

The question, as I now understand it after reading it again,

    I want to merge the changes from the maintenance branches to
    master (and possibly to other maintenance branches if there are
    changes relevant to other products), but I only want to do this for
    our tagged released.

is "which branches, whose tips are already tagged, are not yet in 'master'?"

The one I gave is not what was asked, either, as I misread the question. It was an answer to "which commits are not yet in any tagged version, show them together with the names of branches from which they are reached".