Re: hn/reftable "fixes"
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Patch 1, was discussed before and might be solved in a better way as an
> alternative.
>
> Patch 2 and 3 are "nice to have" for portability and hopefully not controversial
> but could be dropped, if someone feels strongly against it.
>
> Patch 4 is not something I'd found failing anywhere, but the fact that Microsoft
> mentions it is only supported as an extension and it needs to be supported by
> the dynamic linker and I couldn't find anything clear about it in POSIX means,
> that is probably safer this way.
All of them look sensible. Thanks.