Re: Can we clarify the purpose of `git diff -s`?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 12, 2023, 20:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq1qjlp98j.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <645ea15eca6fa_21989f294f5@chronos.notmuch>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> So your rationale to reject a perfectly logical behavior that *everyone* agrees > with is that it might break a hypothetical patch?
Everyone is an overstatement, as there are only Sergey and you, and as we all saw in public some members stated they will not engage in a discussion thread in which you were involved. In addition, at PLC I've seen people complain about how quickly a discussion that involves you becomes unproductive---they may have better sence of backward compatibility concern than you two, but they are staying silent (they are wiser than I am).
> Just do `--silent` instead.
I am *not* shutting the door for "--no-patch"; I am only saying that it shouldn't be done so hastily. Indeed "--silent" or "--squelch" is one of the things that I plan to suggest when we were to go with "--no-patch is no longer -s" topic. But conflating the two will delay the fix for "-s sticks unnecessarily" that is ready for this cycle.
Anyway, I will be wiser and will stay out of this thread from now on, as long as you are involved.