Re: `git stash pop` UX Problem

From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Feb 25, 2014, 12:33 UTC
Message-ID: <vpqzjlf5q2z.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <530C893D.7000108@ira.uka.de>

Holger Hellmuth <hellmuth@ira.uka.de> writes:

Show 11 quoted lines

> Am 24.02.2014 17:21, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
>> $ git add foo.txt
>> $ git status
>> On branch master
>> Changes to be committed:
>>    (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
>>
>>          modified:   foo.txt
>
> Maybe status should display a stash count if that count is > 0, as
> this is part of the state of the repo.

Maybe it would help some users, but not me for example. My main use of "git stash" is a safe replacement for "git reset --hard": when I want to discard changes, but keep them safe just in case.

So, my stash count is almost always >0, and I don't want to hear about it.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/