Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect wording in git-merge.txt.
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@imag.fr>
- Date
- Mar 3, 2008, 21:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqwsojlcu5.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803031519360.2899@xanadu.home>
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
>> Now, I don't understand the distinction you seem to be making between >> "commit" and "commit object". > > Objects are what the low level storage is made of. Conceptually, The > merge operation doesn't work at the object level, but rather at the > history graph level.
I still don't get the distinction. What is the "graph" if not a set of objects pointing to each other?
If you don't want to talk about commit object, then you should fix also user-manual.txt (for example, it states that a merge "create a commit object in the history").
Well, that said, the same sentence as the one I propose without "object" is fine to me, but I just don't understand the difference.
-- Matthieu