git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v2] git-pull.sh: better warning message for "git pull" on detached head.

From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@imag.fr>
Date
Apr 7, 2009, 11:36 UTC
Message-ID
<vpqvdpgn19y.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To
<20090407104145.GA22658@pvv.org>
Finn Arne Gangstad <finnag@pvv.org> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:56:21AM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>> Otherwise, git complains about not finding a branch to pull from in
>> 'branch..merge', which is hardly understandable. While we're there,
>> reword the sentences slightly.
>> [...]
>> +	if [ -z "$curr_branch" ]; then
>> +		echo "You asked me to pull without telling me which branch you want"
>> +		echo "to merge with, and you are on a detached HEAD, so I cannot"
>> [...]
>
> In this case why can't we just do
>
> echo "You are currently not on any branch."

Well, I would understand this as "you can't pull when you're not on a branch", which would be incorrect.

> echo "git pull cannot be run without arguments unless you are on a branch."
This is better (less missleading).
> And possibly also something like this:
>
> echo "Usage: git pull <repository> <refspec>."
> echo " See git-pull(1) for details."
This usage string would be incorrect, repository and refspec are not
always mandatory. To be correct, it should be
Usage: git pull [<repository> <refspec>]
and then you're back to the problem of having to explain why they are
optionnal.
> If you need all the verbosity this error otherwise gives, "detached
> HEAD" is probably going to be confusing?

Grepping the source, "not on a branch" seems more widely used than "detached head" in the UI (including in another place of git-pull.sh), so, yes, something like this would be better:

	if [ -z "$curr_branch" ]; then
		echo "You are not currently on a branch, so I cannot use any"
		echo "'branch.<branchname>.merge' in your configuration file."
		echo "Please specify which branch you want to merge on the command"
		echo "line and try again (e.g. 'git pull <repository> <refspec>')."
		echo "See git-pull(1) for details."
	else
-- 
Matthieu
Previous: Finn Arne GangstadNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 5 of 7 in “git-pull.sh: better warning message for "git pull" on detached head.”
  1. git-pull.sh: better warning message for "git pull" on detached head.Matthieu Moy, Apr 6, 2009
  2. Mike RalphsonApr 7, 2009
  3. git-pull.sh: better warning message for "git pull" on detached head.Matthieu Moy, Apr 7, 2009
  4. Finn Arne GangstadApr 7, 2009
  5. Matthieu MoyApr 7, 2009
  6. Junio C HamanoApr 8, 2009
  7. git-pull.sh: better warning message for "git pull" on detached head.Matthieu Moy, Apr 8, 2009

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.