Re: [PATCH/RFC] credentials helpers+remote helpers
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jun 7, 2012, 17:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqvcj32ggt.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <1339079743-31068-1-git-send-email-Javier.Roucher-Iglesias@ensimag.imag.fr>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] credentials helpers+remote helpers
This is not a good title. The one you have below (which I suggested off-list) should be the first line of the patch.
Javier.Roucher-Iglesias@ensimag.imag.fr writes:
> Add "git credential" plumbing command
(I mean this one)
Show 6 quoted lines
> .gitignore | 1 + > Documentation/git-credential.txt | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Makefile | 1 + > builtin.h | 1 + > builtin/credential.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > git.c | 1 +
No tests?
Since this new command is essentially a copy-paste of test-credential.c, it would indeed make sense to replace test-credential calls in the scripts by calls to this "git credential" command.
> index 0000000..a6e1d0a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/git-credential.txt
This file is not valid asciidoc. Please, run "make doc" and see if the generated HTML is right. Currently, it says
SUBDIR ../
make[1]: `GIT-VERSION-FILE' is up to date.
ASCIIDOC git-credential.html
asciidoc: ERROR: git-credential.txt: line 69: [blockdef-listing] missing closing delimiter
make: *** [git-credential.html] Error 1(didn't I already mention it off-list?)
> +------------------ > +git credential [fill|approve|reject] > + > +------------------
[...]
> +static const char usage_msg[] = > +"credential <fill|approve|reject> [helper...]";
Which one is right?
I already suggested several times that you get rid of this "helper" argument (inherited from test-credential), or that you give it a better API (e.g. --helper HELPER, but not positional argument). If this argument is usefull, then keep it but it should be documented properly.
> +Git-credential permits to save username, password, host, path and protocol. > +When you invoke git-credential, you can ask for a password, using the command > +'git credential fill'.
Who is "you" here? This "you" is the developer writing a script using "git credential", while this one :
> +-If it is not stored, git-credential will ask you to enter > +the password: > + > + > Password for '[http|https]admin@localhost':
... is the user of the script. Please be more precise, e.g. "a script can ask ...", "the user will be prompted for a password".
> +Then if password is correct, you can store using command
if _the_ password ... you can store _it_ using ...
> +If the password is refused, you can delete using command
delete _it_
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/