Re: why is git destructive by default? (i suggest it not be!)

"David Jeske" <jeske@google.com> writes:

Depending on the definition of "potentially destructive", most commands are "potentially destructive".

git pull loses the point where the branch used to point when the reflog expires.

git add loses the old content of the index.

...

And adding too many --force options removes its real value. Many people type "rm -fr" any time they just want "rm", just because they were annoyed by the multiple interactive confirmations of plain "rm" (if aliased to "rm -i"). Asking people to type --force all the time make one fingers type --force mechanically, and removes all its value.