Re: Per-remote tracking branch
Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
>> Setup "foo" so that it fetches "master" only, i.e. have
>> remote.foo.fetch = refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/foo/master
>>
>> You get that setup with: git remote add -t master foo git://...
>>
>> Then there's only one possible choice for "git pull", and it will take
>> that.
>
> Ah, crap, spoke too soon. That works only when branch.<name>.merge is
> not set. Though that's not that much of a problem. When your "primary"
> remote (the one set for branch.<name>.remote) also fetches just a single
> branch, "git pull" will still work, even if branch.<name>.merge is not
> set.
Yes, that's it. Thanks for your anwser, it works.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>