Re: [PATCH] git-ls-files.txt: clarify what "other files" mean for --other
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@imag.fr>
- Date
- Aug 7, 2009, 08:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqprb8xcoq.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmy6cfz9j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> writes: > >> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> >> --- >> Actually, if it was not about backward compatibility, I'd just replace >> -o, --other with -u, --untracked and talk about "untracked" everywhere, >> but compatibility matters more than consistancy for plumbing. > > "ls-files -u" talks about (u)nmerged files.
(forgot this, so -u is even less an option)
> What consistency did you have in mind?
I found no place outside git ls-files where Git talks about "other" files. Everywhere else, it talks about Untracked files.
As for the -u option, git status/commit -u[mode] is for Untracked files, not unmerged ones.
-- Matthieu