Re: fsck option to remove corrupt objects - why/why not?
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Oct 16, 2014, 11:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqmw8w6x9q.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <543F0DAE.2050205@optusnet.com.au>
Ben Aveling <bena.001@optusnet.com.au> writes:
> And that seems sensible to me - the object is corrupt, it is unusable, > the object graph is already broken, we already have big problems, > removing the corrupt object(s) doesn't create any new problems, and it > allows the possibility that the damaged objects can be restored.
Removing completely may remove a chance to restore the corrupt object (rather unlikely, but I can imagine fine binary file surgery to un-break a broken object file).
But we could move them out of Git's object directory (a bit like .git/lost-found, we could have .git/corrupt). For unpacked objects, it's trivial (just mv them in the directory). For packed objects, I don't know what happens in case they are corrupt. That would solve essentially any problem that you can solve by removing the file, but it makes the operation reversible.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/