Re: Git terminology: remote, add, track, stage, etc.
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Oct 20, 2010, 11:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqfww1ksh7.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <BED961D6-5C2A-4535-B706-BFB9727CE398@gmail.com>
Thore Husfeldt <thore.husfeldt@gmail.com> writes:
>> Branch bobsstuff set up to track remote branch master from bob. > > (By the way, I think “remote branch” is useful and correct, here.)
But "track" should be "upstream" here to be consistant with "--set-upstream". Maybe:
Remote branch master from bob set as upstream for bobsstuff.
?
> Let me see if I can use the proposed terminology: > > 1. bob/master *tracks* master. > 2. bob/master is a remote-tracking branch
I do like the dash between remote and tracking.
This is roughly the current terminology, but as you pointed out, it's not used consistantly in the doc.
> 3. master is a remote branch > 4. bob/master has been marked as "upstream" from bobsstuff
That's my understanding too.
(no time for more detailed answer, sorry)
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/