Re: Ambiguous sha-1 during a rebase
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Apr 14, 2016, 13:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqa8kwtjbc.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160414093847.GA10852@glandium.org>
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> Yeah, that definitely is a weird corner case. Interestingly, it was > complaining about "error: short SHA1 e34ff55 is ambiguous." when apply > *other* commits that were in the list prior to it,
I think it did before: when normalizing the list to long sha1, i.e. right after you closed your editor and befor starting anything else.
> That said, that would be less likely to happen if disambiguation was > also checking checking the object type. Collisions between commits are > less likely than between objects of different types.
Right.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/