Re: [Opinion gathering] Git remote whitelist/blacklist
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- May 24, 2016, 19:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqa8jfmfb4.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPc5daURo8SkbeGf0MEsp0sLzdzFfUOxptgusFr58UG9SKmDAA@mail.gmail.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Matthieu Moy > <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: >> So, when trying a forbidden push, Git would deny it and the only way to >> force the push would be to remove the blacklist from the config, right? >> >> Probably the sanest way to go. I thought about adding a "git push >> --force-even-if-in-blacklist" or so, but I don't think the feature >> deserves one specific option (hence add some noise in `git push -h`). > > Yeah, I agree --even-if-in-blacklist is a road to madness, but I wonder > how this is different from setting pushURL to /dev/null or something > illegal and replace that phony configuration value when you really need > to push?
Changing pushURL is something you can do per-repo, but the whitelist/blacklist could be done user-wide or even system-wide (typically, if the sysadmin has control on everybody's /etc/gitconfig, there can be a default policy to prevent accidental push to some URLs).
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/