Re: [PATCH v2] git-checkout.txt: Document "git checkout <pathspec>" better
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jun 17, 2015, 10:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpq8ubiwqo9.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8CuRcV2Rxaz8Ut4ayW-Hyd8Aao5W4JMc20jcfggOG3d4g@mail.gmail.com>
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> wrote: >> -git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree >> +git-checkout - Switch branches or restore changes > > I didn't follow closely the previous discussion.
(Neither did I)
> Forgive me if this is already discussed, but I would keep the "in the > working tree". "Restore changes" alone seems vague.
"Restore previous version" would be better than "Restore changes" to me.
"changes" sounds like "the diff between a commit and its parent", so it makes sense to "revert a change" (git revert), but not "restore a change".
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/