Re: Git merge commit message issue
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jul 6, 2015, 16:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpq8uats0tb.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAArk4YPvO46H2HXkPyPxwirauKXYJ1qpi_GmYMh-T2xz5EdaBQ@mail.gmail.com>
[ Please, don't top-post on this list ]
Andrey Hsiao <andreyhsiao@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> It was a bit sad since we use scripts to do the merge, then we can > check the conflict list in the log message, and assign to separate > owners to resolve them. > > Would it be possible to make it as an config option?
If a script is doing the merge, then I guess you can let your script add the entry in .git/MERGE_MSG (based on something like 'git ls-files -u' or 'git status --porcelain | grep ^U'). This way, your script would work with any version of Git.
Having a config option to restore the old behavior would make sense to me at least. I guess it falls in the category "patches welcome".
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/