Re: [RFC] git integrated bugtracking
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@imag.fr>
- Date
- Jun 3, 2007, 15:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpq1wgtnith.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070603151921.GB30347@artemis>
Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Yeah, now that I read that thread, well yeah, I think notes are a hell > of a good concept for my ideas. I mean, a bug report would be basically > a collection of notes: > * the bug has been found at this commit ; > * the bug has been not-found at this commit ; > * this commit is a fix for that bug ;
That's my feeling too. "Commiting" bug information in the tree is only half of a good idea. You want to be able to say, after the fact, "This commit had bug XYZ". OTOH, the idea (followed by bugs everywhere) that merging a branch would automatically close bugs fixed by this branch is a really cool thing.
The kind of information you're mentionning above can be a great starting point for "bisect". I can even imagine a kind of distributed bisect, where several users could give their "bad commits" for the same bug.
-- Matthieu