Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Link worktrees with relative paths

From: Caleb White <cdwhite3@pm.me>
Date: Oct 8, 2024, 04:48 UTC
Message-ID: <u6rg54FdIvyFm4NUV46fJMur4T3aUYUpz2Pim2cw3gHd1966FysdkWjm_awEmjoWrFo8KNmC3_IL1nLmFquHNNtMc106AyMmUvNgZScK84o=@pm.me>
In-Reply-To: <20241007-wt_relative_paths-v3-0-622cf18c45eb@pm.me>

On Monday, October 7th, 2024 at 22:12, Caleb White via B4 Relay <devnull+cdwhite3.pm.me@kernel.org> wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Changes in v3:
> - Squashed patch [3/4] into patch [2/4] to streamline changes.
> - Dropped patch [4/4] as it was no longer necessary.
> - Rebased onto 20240923075416.54289-1-ericsunshine@charter.net
> - Updated `infer_backlink()` to return 1 on success for consistency.
> - Swapped the order of `infer_backlink()` arguments for clarity.
> - Clear `inferred` if error occurs in `infer_backlink()`.
> - Renamed `git_contents` to `dotgit_contents` for clearer semantics.
> - Cleaned up `dotgit_contents` logic in `repair_worktree_at_path()`.
> - Replaced multiple `xstrfmt/free` calls with a single `strbuf`.
> - Added a test case covering a failure noted in a separate patch series.
> - Improved commit messages.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241006060017.171788-1-cdwhite3@pm.me

All, my apologies for the patch corruption in the first two revisions (I suspect it was due to my SMTP server). I've submitted this v3 series with b4 using the public submission endpoint and I think it turned out much better. But please let me know if you have any issues.

Thanks!