Re: [PATCH v2] Add --track option to git clone
- From
David Soria Parra <sn_@gmx.net>
- Date
- Dec 2, 2009, 10:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <slrnhhcgi8.cpv.sn_@experimentalworks.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20091202192028.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>
On 2009-12-02, Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Quoting David Soria Parra <sn_@gmx.net> writes: > >> I'm aware that it's not possible to give more than one --track >> option. Implementing the possibility to specify multiple --track option >> would certainly a good improvment later, but would also require a lot >> more work as far as I understand the clone code. > > I'm sorry if I'm asking the obvious, but how can multiple --track > options be a useful future enhancement? If I understand your use > case correctly, it's useful when you want to work on only one > branch that isn't the default, and that is why you don't want to > get data necessary for other branches. What does it mean to give > two --track options? You will get one master branch that tracks > both versions, and "git pull" will merge both branches you track?
Similar to git remote add --track it'll pull all branches specified by a --track option and checkout the first one or -o <name> if given. For me personally it's not an improvemen, because I just need to clone on branch, but as git remote add allows multiple branches specified by --track I thought this might be an improvment.