Re: Mercurial on BigTable
- From
Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 11, 2009, 14:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <slrnh325l3.rh5.sitaramc@sitaramc.homelinux.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <4A3065C5.3070203@op5.se>
On 2009-06-11 02:02:45, Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> wrote:
> "http rules all" explanation sounded weak, I'm guessing there were other > reasons as to why they didn't go with git instead, and I'm fairly curious > to hear them. If I was to take a guess, I'd say git is written in a pretty > unfriendly way for implementing other storage engines.
err, umm...
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/117588