Re: Setting up a bug tracking system where users can file bug reports and feature requests for Git
- From
Johannes Gilger <heipei@hackvalue.de>
- Date
- Feb 16, 2009, 09:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <slrngpibdp.gmk.heipei@minime.lan>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vab8nf38a.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 2009-02-16, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> A tracking system is just a tool. You need to have a competent and stable > project secretary whose job is to look after the issues database. The > tasks involved are to expire the stale ones, to reject invalid entries, to > prod the bug reporter for additional information, to find a volunteer to > take up on an individual issue, to prod the bug reporter for confirmation > on the fix once it is ready, and to close completed issues.
As I've been against web-based bug-trackers before I'd like to present an idea which, imho, is a good compromise. I'm afraid that the number of false bug-reports will increase dramatically with the introduction of such a bug-tracker, eating up time of the volunteers. Also, as I mentioned, I really dislike using web-based tools.
If we had such a secretary who's not only familiar with the bugtracker but also familiar enough with git and it's development organization, he/she could work with the system, filter out the noise and mail real bugs or well-thought-through feature-requests to this mailing-list (with a link back to the bugtracker) with the full text of the bug and maybe his/her oppinion about it.
But maybe that's just duplication of work, in your eyes.
Greetings, Jojo
-- Johannes Gilger <heipei@hackvalue.de> http://hackvalue.de/heipei/ GPG-Key: 0x42F6DE81 GPG-Fingerprint: BB49 F967 775E BB52 3A81 882C 58EE B178 42F6 DE81