Re: user manual question
- From
Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 28, 2008, 14:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <slrnglf3qh.c7j.sitaramc@sitaramc.homelinux.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <gj7mmo$fvk$4@ger.gmane.org>
On 2008-12-28, Zorba <cr@altmore.co.uk> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Under "Examining an old version without creating a new branch" subsection in > chapter1 > > to aid my understanding, could the statement: > > "The HEAD then refers to the SHA1 of the commit instead of to a branch, and > git branch shows that you are no longer on a branch:" > > be restated more explicitly as: > > "The HEAD then refers to the SHA1 of the commit instead of to a branch head, > and git branch shows that you are no longer on a branch head:"
Sure, but I prefer "tip"; reduces confusion between "head" and "HEAD" in spoken descriptions (I teach internal classes on git occasionally, once even on a conf call!)
The git glossary makes no mention of "tip", so this is probably "unblessed" :-)