Re: git-email automatic --to detection?
- From
- John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Date
- Feb 26, 2008, 13:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <slrnfs86qr.prc.jgoerzen@katherina.lan.complete.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080225205505.GY31441@genesis.frugalware.org>
On 2008-02-25, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> configured his stuff correctly, it's really "darcs get; ... ; darcs >> record; darcs send". git-send-email is nice, but harder to use for a >> first-timer. > > that's true, while the practice can be the opposite. darcs forces you to > have an smtpd on localhost, while git allows you to send the patch from > your mail client. this _is_ easier for people sometimes. (especially > these days when everybody blocks dhcp address ranges and an avarage user > doesn't configure a proxy smtpd on localhost usually i think.)
Actually, both can do both, right? darcs send -o will write the data to send out to a file on disk, and git-send-email will transmit the message. I don't so much care about the default as making it easy for people that do have a local sendmail or smtpd or (ugh) MAPI client to send patches automatically, if I tell them what flags to use.
-- John