git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH v2 0/2] [v2.24.0-rc0 BUG] fetch.writeCommitGraph fails on first fetch

From
Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Date
Oct 23, 2019, 13:01 UTC
Message-ID
<pull.415.v2.git.1571835695.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<pull.415.git.1571765335.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

UPDATE for V2: We now know the full repro, and a test is added. Thanks Szeder and Peff for your insights!

While dogfooding, Johannes found a bug in the fetch.writeCommitGraph config behavior. While his example initially happened during a clone with --recurse-submodules, (UPDATE) and the submodule is important, but --recurse-submodules is not:

$ git clone <url> test
$ cd test
$ git -c fetch.writeCommitGraph=true fetch origin
Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (12/12), done.
BUG: commit-graph.c:886: missing parent <hash1> for commit <hash2>
Aborted (core dumped)

In the repo I had cloned, there were really 60 commits to scan, but only 12 were in the list to write when calling compute_generation_numbers(). A commit in the list expects to see a parent, but that parent is not in the list. The simple example I used for my testing was https://github.com/derrickstolee/numbers. Thie repo HAS A SUBMODULE, I just forgot. Sorry for derailing the investigation somewhat.

The details above are the start of the commit message for [PATCH 1/2], including a test that fails when fetching after cloning a repo with a submodule.

In [PATCH 2/2], I actually have the fix. I tried to include as much detail as I could for how I investigated the problem and why I think this is the right solution. I added details that have come from the on-list discussion, including what the submodule code is doing and why REACHABLE is no longer used in commit-reach.c.

Thanks, -Stolee
Derrick Stolee (2):
  t5510-fetch.sh: demonstrate fetch.writeCommitGraph bug
  commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetch
 commit-graph.c   | 11 +++++++----
 commit-reach.c   |  1 -
 object.h         |  3 ++-
 t/t5510-fetch.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
base-commit: d966095db01190a2196e31195ea6fa0c722aa732
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-415%2Fderrickstolee%2Ffetch-first-write-fail-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-415/derrickstolee/fetch-first-write-fail-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/415
Range-diff vs v1:
 -:  ---------- > 1:  6ac0a05746 t5510-fetch.sh: demonstrate fetch.writeCommitGraph bug
 1:  a1e5280d4b ! 2:  ca59b118f1 commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetch
     @@ -2,10 +2,13 @@
      
          commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetch
      
     -    While dogfooding, Johannes found a bug in the fetch.writeCommitGraph
     -    config behavior. While his example initially happened during a clone
     -    with --recurse-submodules, we found that it is actually a problem with
     -    the first fetch after a new clone and no existing commit-graph file:
     +    The previous commit includes a failing test for an issue around
     +    fetch.writeCommitGraph and fetching in a repo with a submodule. Here, we
     +    fix that bug and set the test to "test_expect_success".
     +
     +    The prolem arises with this set of commands when the remote repo at
     +    <url> has a submodule. Note that --recurse-submodules is not needed to
     +    demonstrate the bug.
      
                  $ git clone <url> test
                  $ cd test
     @@ -14,12 +17,7 @@
                  BUG: commit-graph.c:886: missing parent <hash1> for commit <hash2>
                  Aborted (core dumped)
      
     -    In the repo I had cloned, there were really 60 commits to scan, but
     -    only 12 were in the list to write when calling
     -    compute_generation_numbers(). A commit in the list expects to see a
     -    parent, but that parent is not in the list.
     -
     -    As an initial test, I converted the code in builtin/fetch.c that calls
     +    As an initial fix, I converted the code in builtin/fetch.c that calls
          write_commit_graph_reachable() to instead launch a "git commit-graph
          write --reachable --split" process. That code worked, but is not how we
          want the feature to work long-term.
     @@ -60,20 +58,28 @@
          flag inside close_reachable(), but the tips did not have the flag, so
          that did nothing.
      
     +    It turns out that the calculate_changed_submodule_paths() method is at
     +    fault. Thanks, Peff, for pointing out this detail! More specifically,
     +    for each submodule, the collect_changed_submodules() runs a revision
     +    walk to essentially do file-history on the list of submodules. That
     +    revision walk marks commits UNININTERESTING if they are simiplified away
     +    by not changing the submodule.
     +
          Instead, I finally arrived on the conclusion that I should use a flag
          that is not used in any other part of the code. In commit-reach.c, a
          number of flags were defined for commit walk algorithms. The REACHABLE
          flag seemed like it made the most sense, and it seems it was not
     -    actually used in the file.
     +    actually used in the file. The REACHABLE flag was used in early versions
     +    of commit-reach.c, but was removed by 4fbcca4 (commit-reach: make
     +    can_all_from_reach... linear, 2018-07-20).
      
          Add the REACHABLE flag to commit-graph.c and use it instead of
          UNINTERESTING in close_reachable(). This fixes the bug in manual
          testing.
      
     -    I have failed to produce a test using the file:// protocol that
     -    demonstrates this bug.
     -
          Reported-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
     +    Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
     +    Helped-by: Szeder Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
          Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
      
       diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c
     @@ -147,3 +153,16 @@
        * sha1-name.c:                                              20
        * list-objects-filter.c:                                      21
        * builtin/fsck.c:           0--3
     +
     + diff --git a/t/t5510-fetch.sh b/t/t5510-fetch.sh
     + --- a/t/t5510-fetch.sh
     + +++ b/t/t5510-fetch.sh
     +@@
     + 	)
     + '
     + 
     +-test_expect_failure 'fetch.writeCommitGraph with submodules' '
     ++test_expect_success 'fetch.writeCommitGraph with submodules' '
     + 	pwd="$(pwd)" &&
     + 	git clone dups super &&
     + 	(
-- 
gitgitgadget
Previous: Jeff KingNext: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
Message 9 of 23 in “[v2.24.0-rc0 BUG] fetch.writeCommitGraph fails on first fetch”
  1. 0/1 [v2.24.0-rc0 BUG] fetch.writeCommitGraph fails on first fetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 22, 2019
  2. 1/1 commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 22, 2019
  3. Jeff KingOct 22, 2019
  4. Jeff KingOct 22, 2019
  5. SZEDER GáborOct 22, 2019
  6. Derrick StoleeOct 23, 2019
  7. Jeff KingOct 23, 2019
  8. Jeff KingOct 23, 2019
  9. 0/2 [v2.24.0-rc0 BUG] fetch.writeCommitGraph fails on first fetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 23, 2019
  10. 1/2 t5510-fetch.sh: demonstrate fetch.writeCommitGraph bugDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 23, 2019
  11. SZEDER GáborOct 23, 2019
  12. Derrick StoleeOct 23, 2019
  13. SZEDER GáborOct 24, 2019
  14. 2/2 commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 23, 2019
  15. SZEDER GáborOct 23, 2019
  16. Derrick StoleeOct 24, 2019
  17. SZEDER GáborOct 30, 2019
  18. 0/2 [v2.24.0-rc0 BUG] fetch.writeCommitGraph fails on first fetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 24, 2019
  19. 1/2 t5510-fetch.sh: demonstrate fetch.writeCommitGraph bugDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 24, 2019
  20. 2/2 commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 24, 2019
  21. 0/2 [v2.24.0-rc0 BUG] fetch.writeCommitGraph fails on first fetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 24, 2019
  22. 1/2 t5510-fetch.sh: demonstrate fetch.writeCommitGraph bugDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 24, 2019
  23. 2/2 commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetchDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Oct 24, 2019

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.