git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH v5] subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees present

From
Zach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Date
Nov 28, 2023, 21:17 UTC
Message-ID
<pull.1587.v5.git.1701206267300.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<pull.1587.v4.git.1698347871200.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
From: Zach FettersMoore <zach.fetters@apollographql.com>

When there are multiple subtrees present in a repository and they are all using 'git subtree split', the 'split' command can take a significant (and constantly growing) amount of time to run even when using the '--rejoin' flag. This is due to the fact that when processing commits to determine the last known split to start from when looking for changes, if there has been a split/merge done from another subtree there will be 2 split commits, one mainline and one subtree, for the second subtree that are part of the processing. The non-mainline subtree split commit will cause the processing to always need to search the entire history of the given subtree as part of its processing even though those commits are totally irrelevant to the current subtree split being run.

To see this in practice you can use the open source GitHub repo 'apollo-ios-dev' and do the following in order:

-Make a changes to a file in 'apollo-ios'A and 'apollo-ios-codegen'
 directories
-Create a commit containing these changes
-Do a split on apollo-ios-codegen
   - git subtree split --prefix=apollo-ios-codegen --squash --rejoin
-Do a split on apollo-ios
   - git subtree split --prefix=apollo-ios --squash --rejoin
-Make changes to a file in apollo-ios-codegen
-Create a commit containing the change(s)
-Do a split on apollo-ios-codegen
   - git subtree split --prefix=apollo-ios-codegen --squash --rejoin

You will see that the final split is looking for the last split on apollo-ios-codegen to use as it's starting point to process commits. Since there is a split commit from apollo-ios in between the 2 splits run on apollo-ios-codegen, the processing ends up traversing the entire history of apollo-ios which increases the time it takes to do a split based on how long of a history apollo-ios has, while none of these commits are relevant to the split being done on apollo-ios-codegen.

So this commit makes a change to the processing of commits for the split command in order to ignore non-mainline commits from other subtrees such as apollo-ios in the above breakdown by adding a new function 'should_ignore_subtree_commit' which is called during 'process_split_commit'. This allows the split/rejoin processing to still function as expected but removes all of the unnecessary processing that takes place currently which greatly inflates the processing time. In the above example, previously the final split would take ~10-12 minutes, while after this fix it takes seconds.

Added a test to validate that the proposed fix solves the issue.

The test accomplishes this by checking the output of the split command to ensure the output from the progress of 'process_split_commit' function that represents the 'extracount' of commits processed remains at 0, meaning none of the commits from the second subtree were processed.

This was tested against the original functionality to show the test failed, and then with this fix to show the test passes.

This illustrated that when using multiple subtrees, A and B, when doing a split on subtree B, the processing does not traverse the entire history of subtree A which is unnecessary and would cause the 'extracount' of processed commits to climb based on the number of commits in the history of subtree A.

Signed-off-by: Zach FettersMoore <zach.fetters@apollographql.com>
---
    subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees present
    
    When there are multiple subtrees in a repo and git subtree split
    --rejoin is being used for the subtrees, the processing of commits for a
    new split can take a significant (and constantly growing) amount of time
    because the split commits from other subtrees cause the processing to
    have to scan the entire history of the other subtree(s). This patch
    filters out the other subtree split commits that are unnecessary for the
    split commit processing.
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1587%2FBobaFetters%2Fzf%2Fmulti-subtree-processing-v5
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1587/BobaFetters/zf/multi-subtree-processing-v5
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1587
Range-diff vs v4:
 1:  353152910eb ! 1:  e7445a95f30 subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees present
     @@ Commit message
          though those commits are totally irrelevant to the current subtree
          split being run.
      
     -    In the diagram below, 'M' represents the mainline repo branch, 'A'
     -    represents one subtree, and 'B' represents another. M3 and B1 represent
     -    a split commit for subtree B that was created from commit M4. M2 and A1
     -    represent a split commit made from subtree A that was also created
     -    based on changes back to and including M4. M1 represents new changes to
     -    the repo, in this scenario if you try to run a 'git subtree split
     -    --rejoin' for subtree B, commits M1, M2, and A1, will be included in
     -    the processing of changes for the new split commit since the last
     -    split/rejoin for subtree B was at M3. The issue is that by having A1
     -    included in this processing the command ends up needing to processing
     -    every commit down tree A even though none of that is needed or relevant
     -    to the current command and result.
     +    To see this in practice you can use the open source GitHub repo
     +    'apollo-ios-dev' and do the following in order:
      
     -    M1
     -     |        \       \
     -    M2         |       |
     -     |        A1       |
     -    M3         |       |
     -     |         |      B1
     -    M4         |       |
     +    -Make a changes to a file in 'apollo-ios'A and 'apollo-ios-codegen'
     +     directories
     +    -Create a commit containing these changes
     +    -Do a split on apollo-ios-codegen
     +       - git subtree split --prefix=apollo-ios-codegen --squash --rejoin
     +    -Do a split on apollo-ios
     +       - git subtree split --prefix=apollo-ios --squash --rejoin
     +    -Make changes to a file in apollo-ios-codegen
     +    -Create a commit containing the change(s)
     +    -Do a split on apollo-ios-codegen
     +       - git subtree split --prefix=apollo-ios-codegen --squash --rejoin
      
     -    So this commit makes a change to the processing of commits for the split
     -    command in order to ignore non-mainline commits from other subtrees such
     -    as A1 in the diagram by adding a new function
     -    'should_ignore_subtree_commit' which is called during
     -    'process_split_commit'. This allows the split/rejoin processing to still
     -    function as expected but removes all of the unnecessary processing that
     -    takes place currently which greatly inflates the processing time.
     +    You will see that the final split is looking for the last split
     +    on apollo-ios-codegen to use as it's starting point to process
     +    commits. Since there is a split commit from apollo-ios in between the
     +    2 splits run on apollo-ios-codegen, the processing ends up traversing
     +    the entire history of apollo-ios which increases the time it takes to
     +    do a split based on how long of a history apollo-ios has, while none
     +    of these commits are relevant to the split being done on
     +    apollo-ios-codegen.
     +
     +    So this commit makes a change to the processing of commits for the
     +    split command in order to ignore non-mainline commits from other
     +    subtrees such as apollo-ios in the above breakdown by adding a new
     +    function 'should_ignore_subtree_commit' which is called during
     +    'process_split_commit'. This allows the split/rejoin processing to
     +    still function as expected but removes all of the unnecessary
     +    processing that takes place currently which greatly inflates the
     +    processing time. In the above example, previously the final split
     +    would take ~10-12 minutes, while after this fix it takes seconds.
      
          Added a test to validate that the proposed fix
          solves the issue.
     @@ Commit message
          of the split command to ensure the output from
          the progress of 'process_split_commit' function
          that represents the 'extracount' of commits
     -    processed does not increment.
     +    processed remains at 0, meaning none of the commits
     +    from the second subtree were processed.
      
          This was tested against the original functionality
          to show the test failed, and then with this fix
     @@ contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh: ensure_valid_ref_format () {
      +# Usage: check if a commit from another subtree should be
      +# ignored from processing for splits
      +should_ignore_subtree_split_commit () {
     -+  if test -n "$(git log -1 --grep="git-subtree-dir:" $1)"
     -+  then
     -+    if test -z "$(git log -1 --grep="git-subtree-mainline:" $1)" &&
     -+			test -z "$(git log -1 --grep="git-subtree-dir: $arg_prefix$" $1)"
     -+    then
     -+      return 0
     -+    fi
     -+  fi
     -+  return 1
     ++	assert test $# = 1
     ++	local rev="$1"
     ++	if test -n "$(git log -1 --grep="git-subtree-dir:" $rev)"
     ++	then
     ++		if test -z "$(git log -1 --grep="git-subtree-mainline:" $rev)" &&
     ++			test -z "$(git log -1 --grep="git-subtree-dir: $arg_prefix$" $rev)"
     ++		then
     ++			return 0
     ++		fi
     ++	fi
     ++	return 1
      +}
      +
       # Usage: process_split_commit REV PARENTS
     @@ contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh: cmd_split () {
      +		then
      +			continue
      +		fi
     -+		parsedParents=''
     ++		parsedparents=''
      +		for parent in $parents
      +		do
     -+			should_ignore_subtree_split_commit "$parent"
     -+			if test $? -eq 1
     ++			if ! should_ignore_subtree_split_commit "$parent"
      +			then
     -+				parsedParents+="$parent "
     ++				parsedparents="$parsedparents$parent "
      +			fi
      +		done
     -+		process_split_commit "$rev" "$parsedParents"
     ++		process_split_commit "$rev" "$parsedparents"
       	done || exit $?
       
       	latest_new=$(cache_get latest_new) || exit $?
     @@ contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh: test_expect_success 'split sub dir/ with --r
       	)
       '
       
     ++# Tests that commits from other subtrees are not processed as
     ++# part of a split.
     ++#
     ++# This test performs the following:
     ++# - Creates Repo with subtrees 'subA' and 'subB'
     ++# - Creates commits in the repo including changes to subtrees
     ++# - Runs the following 'split' and commit' commands in order:
     ++# 	- Perform 'split' on subtree A
     ++# 	- Perform 'split' on subtree B
     ++# 	- Create new commits with changes to subtree A and B
     ++# 	- Perform split on subtree A
     ++# 	- Check that the commits in subtree B are not processed
     ++#			as part of the subtree A split
      +test_expect_success 'split with multiple subtrees' '
      +	subtree_test_create_repo "$test_count" &&
      +	subtree_test_create_repo "$test_count/subA" &&
     @@ contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh: test_expect_success 'split sub dir/ with --r
      +	test_create_commit "$test_count/subA" subA2 &&
      +	test_create_commit "$test_count/subA" subA3 &&
      +	test_create_commit "$test_count/subB" subB1 &&
     -+	(
     -+		cd "$test_count" &&
     -+		git fetch ./subA HEAD &&
     -+		git subtree add --prefix=subADir FETCH_HEAD
     -+	) &&
     -+	(
     -+		cd "$test_count" &&
     -+		git fetch ./subB HEAD &&
     -+		git subtree add --prefix=subBDir FETCH_HEAD
     -+	) &&
     ++	git -C "$test_count" fetch ./subA HEAD &&
     ++	git -C "$test_count" subtree add --prefix=subADir FETCH_HEAD &&
     ++	git -C "$test_count" fetch ./subB HEAD &&
     ++	git -C "$test_count" subtree add --prefix=subBDir FETCH_HEAD &&
      +	test_create_commit "$test_count" subADir/main-subA1 &&
      +	test_create_commit "$test_count" subBDir/main-subB1 &&
     -+	(
     -+		cd "$test_count" &&
     -+		git subtree split --prefix=subADir --squash --rejoin -m "Sub A Split 1"
     -+	) &&
     -+	(
     -+		cd "$test_count" &&
     -+		git subtree split --prefix=subBDir --squash --rejoin -m "Sub B Split 1"
     -+	) &&
     ++	git -C "$test_count" subtree split --prefix=subADir \
     ++		--squash --rejoin -m "Sub A Split 1" &&
     ++	git -C "$test_count" subtree split --prefix=subBDir \
     ++		--squash --rejoin -m "Sub B Split 1" &&
      +	test_create_commit "$test_count" subADir/main-subA2 &&
      +	test_create_commit "$test_count" subBDir/main-subB2 &&
     -+	(
     -+		cd "$test_count" &&
     -+		git subtree split --prefix=subADir --squash --rejoin -m "Sub A Split 2"
     -+	) &&
     -+	(
     -+		cd "$test_count" &&
     -+		test "$(git subtree split --prefix=subBDir --squash --rejoin \
     -+		 -d -m "Sub B Split 1" 2>&1 | grep -w "\[1\]")" = ""
     -+	)
     ++	git -C "$test_count" subtree split --prefix=subADir \
     ++		--squash --rejoin -m "Sub A Split 2" &&
     ++	test "$(git -C "$test_count" subtree split --prefix=subBDir \
     ++		--squash --rejoin -d -m "Sub B Split 1" 2>&1 | grep -w "\[1\]")" = ""
      +'
      +
       test_expect_success 'split sub dir/ with --rejoin from scratch' '
 contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh     | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh b/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
index e0c5d3b0de6..a0bf958ea66 100755
--- a/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
+++ b/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
@@ -778,6 +778,22 @@ ensure_valid_ref_format () {
 		die "fatal: '$1' does not look like a ref"
 }
 
+# Usage: check if a commit from another subtree should be
+# ignored from processing for splits
+should_ignore_subtree_split_commit () {
+	assert test $# = 1
+	local rev="$1"
+	if test -n "$(git log -1 --grep="git-subtree-dir:" $rev)"
+	then
+		if test -z "$(git log -1 --grep="git-subtree-mainline:" $rev)" &&
+			test -z "$(git log -1 --grep="git-subtree-dir: $arg_prefix$" $rev)"
+		then
+			return 0
+		fi
+	fi
+	return 1
+}
+
 # Usage: process_split_commit REV PARENTS
 process_split_commit () {
 	assert test $# = 2
@@ -963,7 +979,19 @@ cmd_split () {
 	eval "$grl" |
 	while read rev parents
 	do
-		process_split_commit "$rev" "$parents"
+		if should_ignore_subtree_split_commit "$rev"
+		then
+			continue
+		fi
+		parsedparents=''
+		for parent in $parents
+		do
+			if ! should_ignore_subtree_split_commit "$parent"
+			then
+				parsedparents="$parsedparents$parent "
+			fi
+		done
+		process_split_commit "$rev" "$parsedparents"
 	done || exit $?
 
 	latest_new=$(cache_get latest_new) || exit $?
diff --git a/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh b/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh
index 49a21dd7c9c..ca4df5be832 100755
--- a/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh
+++ b/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh
@@ -385,6 +385,46 @@ test_expect_success 'split sub dir/ with --rejoin' '
 	)
 '
 
+# Tests that commits from other subtrees are not processed as
+# part of a split.
+#
+# This test performs the following:
+# - Creates Repo with subtrees 'subA' and 'subB'
+# - Creates commits in the repo including changes to subtrees
+# - Runs the following 'split' and commit' commands in order:
+# 	- Perform 'split' on subtree A
+# 	- Perform 'split' on subtree B
+# 	- Create new commits with changes to subtree A and B
+# 	- Perform split on subtree A
+# 	- Check that the commits in subtree B are not processed
+#			as part of the subtree A split
+test_expect_success 'split with multiple subtrees' '
+	subtree_test_create_repo "$test_count" &&
+	subtree_test_create_repo "$test_count/subA" &&
+	subtree_test_create_repo "$test_count/subB" &&
+	test_create_commit "$test_count" main1 &&
+	test_create_commit "$test_count/subA" subA1 &&
+	test_create_commit "$test_count/subA" subA2 &&
+	test_create_commit "$test_count/subA" subA3 &&
+	test_create_commit "$test_count/subB" subB1 &&
+	git -C "$test_count" fetch ./subA HEAD &&
+	git -C "$test_count" subtree add --prefix=subADir FETCH_HEAD &&
+	git -C "$test_count" fetch ./subB HEAD &&
+	git -C "$test_count" subtree add --prefix=subBDir FETCH_HEAD &&
+	test_create_commit "$test_count" subADir/main-subA1 &&
+	test_create_commit "$test_count" subBDir/main-subB1 &&
+	git -C "$test_count" subtree split --prefix=subADir \
+		--squash --rejoin -m "Sub A Split 1" &&
+	git -C "$test_count" subtree split --prefix=subBDir \
+		--squash --rejoin -m "Sub B Split 1" &&
+	test_create_commit "$test_count" subADir/main-subA2 &&
+	test_create_commit "$test_count" subBDir/main-subB2 &&
+	git -C "$test_count" subtree split --prefix=subADir \
+		--squash --rejoin -m "Sub A Split 2" &&
+	test "$(git -C "$test_count" subtree split --prefix=subBDir \
+		--squash --rejoin -d -m "Sub B Split 1" 2>&1 | grep -w "\[1\]")" = ""
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'split sub dir/ with --rejoin from scratch' '
 	subtree_test_create_repo "$test_count" &&
 	test_create_commit "$test_count" main1 &&

base-commit: bda494f4043963b9ec9a1ecd4b19b7d1cd9a0518
-- 
gitgitgadget
Previous: Zach FettersMooreNext: Christian Couder
Message 15 of 30 in “subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees present”
  1. subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees presentZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Sep 18, 2023
  2. Junio C HamanoSep 18, 2023
  3. Junio C HamanoSep 19, 2023
  4. Zach FettersMooreOct 26, 2023
  5. 0/2 subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees presentZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Sep 22, 2023
  6. 2/2 subtree: changing location of commit ignore processingZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Sep 22, 2023
  7. 1/2 subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees presentZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Sep 22, 2023
  8. 0/3 subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees presentZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Sep 29, 2023
  9. 2/3 subtree: changing location of commit ignore processingZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Sep 29, 2023
  10. 3/3 subtree: adding test to validate fixZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Sep 29, 2023
  11. 1/3 subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees presentZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Sep 29, 2023
  12. subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees presentZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Oct 26, 2023
  13. Christian CouderNov 18, 2023
  14. Zach FettersMooreNov 28, 2023
  15. subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees presentZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Nov 28, 2023
  16. Christian CouderNov 30, 2023
  17. Zach FettersMooreNov 30, 2023
  18. subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees presentZach FettersMoore via GitGitGadget, Dec 1, 2023
  19. Christian CouderDec 4, 2023
  20. Zach FettersMooreDec 11, 2023
  21. Christian CouderDec 12, 2023
  22. Junio C HamanoDec 12, 2023
  23. Zach FettersMooreDec 13, 2023
  24. Christian CouderJan 3, 2024
  25. Christian CouderDec 20, 2023
  26. Christian CouderJan 25, 2024
  27. Junio C HamanoJan 25, 2024
  28. Christian CouderJan 25, 2024
  29. Junio C HamanoJan 25, 2024
  30. subtree: [v2.44 regression] split may produce different historyColin Stagner, Aug 21, 2025

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.