Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] New 'stage' command

From: Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org>
Date: Apr 7, 2009, 15:01 UTC
Message-ID: <op.ur0uofkh4oyyg1@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <878wmcj1fs.fsf@krank.kagedal.org>

On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:46:47 -0700, David Kågedal <davidk@lysator.liu.se> wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> "Octavio Alvarez" <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org> writes:
>
>> The difference between git diff and git reset is that git diff should  
>> take
>> a range of trees, not a range of commits as parameters. OTOH, git reset
>> doesn't know or care about trees, it needs commits.
>
> No, git diff doesn't take a range. It takes two trees (including the
> work "tree" and the index "tree"). The A..B syntax is nonsense for git
> diff, but I believe it supported for historical reasons.
>

Thanks.

I correct by s/range of// but the case persists.