Re: [PATCH v2] t0051: use "skip_all" under !MINGW in single-test file
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 8, 2022, 13:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2202081437450.347@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <patch-v2-1.1-1bc93bcba4b-20220204T134208Z-avarab@gmail.com>
Hi Ævar,
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> Have this file added in 06ba9d03e34 (t0051: test GIT_TRACE to a > windows named pipe, 2018-09-11) use the same "skip_all" pattern as an > existing Windows-only test added in 0e218f91c29 (mingw: unset PERL5LIB > by default, 2018-10-30) uses.
This is not a nit, even if I won't insist on changing it in this instance: This sentence is unnecessarily convoluted and therefore harder to read than it has to be. Please pay attention to readability next time you craft a commit message.
The rest of the commit message as well as the diff look good to me.
Thanks, Johannes
Show 77 quoted lines
>
> This way TAP consumers like "prove" will show a nice summary when the
> test is skipped. Instead of:
>
> $ prove t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh
> [...]
> t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh .. ok
> [...]
>
> We will prominently show a "skipped" notice:
>
> $ prove t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh
> [...]
> t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh ... skipped: skipping Windows-specific tests
> [...]
>
> This is because we are now making use of the right TAP-y way to
> communicate this to the consumer. I.e. skipping the whole test file,
> v.s. skipping individual tests (in this case there's only one test).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
> ---
> Range-diff against v1:
> 1: 34ff968dcb8 ! 1: 1bc93bcba4b t0051: use "skip_all" under !MINGW in single-test file
> @@ Commit message
> by default, 2018-10-30) uses.
>
> This way TAP consumers like "prove" will show a nice summary when the
> - test is skipped, e.g.:
> + test is skipped. Instead of:
> +
> + $ prove t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh
> + [...]
> + t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh .. ok
> + [...]
> +
> + We will prominently show a "skipped" notice:
>
> $ prove t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh
> [...]
> t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh ... skipped: skipping Windows-specific tests
> [...]
>
> + This is because we are now making use of the right TAP-y way to
> + communicate this to the consumer. I.e. skipping the whole test file,
> + v.s. skipping individual tests (in this case there's only one test).
> +
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
>
> ## t/t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh ##
>
> t/t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh b/t/t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh
> index 10ac92d2250..412f413360d 100755
> --- a/t/t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh
> +++ b/t/t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh
> @@ -3,8 +3,13 @@
> test_description='Windows named pipes'
>
> . ./test-lib.sh
> +if ! test_have_prereq MINGW
> +then
> + skip_all='skipping Windows-specific tests'
> + test_done
> +fi
>
> -test_expect_success MINGW 'o_append write to named pipe' '
> +test_expect_success 'o_append write to named pipe' '
> GIT_TRACE="$(pwd)/expect" git status >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
> { test-tool windows-named-pipe t0051 >actual 2>&1 & } &&
> pid=$! &&
> --
> 2.35.1.940.ge7a5b4b05f2
>
>