Re: [PATCH 0/3] t2106 vs. the default branch name
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 18, 2020, 22:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2011182324370.56@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqsg96z602.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > > The four test scripts for which I sent patch series in the past hours to > > remove the use of the name `master` won't be touched by v3 of this here > > patch series at all (because it won't be necessary anymore). > > Ah, OK. I somehow had an impression that the big series was more or > less done
Me, too. And if I had listened to certain people who claim that lazy programmers are the best programmers, I would have stopped there, too.
> but rethinking the structure and ejecting these changes to tests that do > not care what name the "init" uses by default from the series makes a > lot of sense.
Yep.
Ciao, Dscho