Re: [PATCH v11 20/22] stash: convert `stash--helper.c` into `stash.c`

> On Tue, Nov 27 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > The old shell script `git-stash.sh`  was removed and replaced
> >> > entirely by `builtin/stash.c`. In order to do that, `create` and
> >> > `push` were adapted to work without `stash.sh`. For example, before
> >> > this commit, `git stash create` called `git stash--helper create
> >> > --message "$*"`. If it called `git stash--helper create "$@"`, then
> >> > some of these changes wouldn't have been necessary.
> >> >
> >> > This commit also removes the word `helper` since now stash is
> >> > called directly and not by a shell script.
> >>
> >> Seeing the recent trouble in "rebase in C" and how keeping the
> >> scripted version as "git legacy-rebase" helped us postpone the
> >> rewritten version without ripping the whole thing out, I wonder if
> >> we can do the same here.
> >
> > Feel very free to cherry-pick
> > https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/commit/004da7e7faa36c872868ae938e06594ea1c2f01c
> > and
> > https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/commit/cedfcd39f5a4e4beb33e16fa67c4659fd4bdabf6
> > which is what we carry in Git for Windows.
> 
> ...and then something similar to 62c23938fa ("tests: add a special setup
> where rebase.useBuiltin is off", 2018-11-14) so those of us who're
> smoking next for bugs can test both and report if some of the test
> setups (odd OS's etc) show a difference in behavior.