Re: No --no-gpg-sign option with "git rebase"
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 22, 2018, 09:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1810221100330.4546@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <3511237.7GcYbsQxqc@g550jk>
Hi Luca,
I re-Cc:ed the Git mailing list (it is in general a very good idea to keep it in Cc:, as I could be hit by a bus, for example).
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018, Luca Weiss wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018 17:30:17 CEST you wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > > See subject, would be quite useful to have this. ("Countermand
> > > commit.gpgSign configuration variable that is set to force each and
> > > every commit to be signed.")
> >
> > Have you tried the built-in rebase? It's already available in `next`,
> > and it is available in Git for Windows as an experimental feature.
>
> in the 'next' branch the option "--no-gpg-sign" is actually accepted for
> git rebase (not listed in "--help" output or the man page though) but
> git still tries to sign each commit.Did you get a chance to debug this?
Ciao, Johannes