Re: Trivial enhancement: All commands which require an author should accept --author

> On Thu, Aug 30 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> >>
> >> > The `stash` command only incidentally requires that the author is set, as
> >> > it calls `git commit` internally (which records the author). As stashes
> >> > are intended to be local only, that author information was never meant to
> >> > be a vital part of the `stash`.
> >> >
> >> > I could imagine that an even better enhancement request would ask for `git
> >> > stash` to work even if `user.name` is not configured.
> >>
> >> This would make a good bite-sized microproject, worth marking it as
> >> #leftoverbits unless somebody is already working on it ;-)
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > What is our currently-favored approach to this, again? Do we have a
> > favorite wiki page to list those, or do we have a bug tracker for such
> > mini-projects?
> >
> > Once I know, I will add this, with enough information to get anybody
> > interested started.
> 
> I believe the "official" way, such as it is, is you just put
> #leftoverbits in your E-Mail, then search the list archives,
> e.g. https://public-inbox.org/git/?q=%23leftoverbits
> 
> So e.g. I've taken to putting this in my own E-Mails where I spot
> something I'd like to note as a TODO that I (or someone else) could work
> on later:
> https://public-inbox.org/git/?q=%23leftoverbits+f%3Aavarab%40gmail.com