Re: Measuring Community Involvement (was Re: Contributor Summit planning)
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 27, 2018, 15:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1808271755160.73@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8DYYL5cNSo4ibWNmiexdWkhob1QTqFxJz56dSu8NdDViA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Duy,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Show 37 quoted lines
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:43 PM Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2. Number of other commit tag-lines (Reviewed-By, Helped-By, > > Reported-By, etc.). > > > > Using git repo: > > > > $ git log --since=2018-01-01 junio/next|grep by:|grep -v > > Signed-off-by:|sort|uniq -c|sort -nr|head -n 20 > > > > 66 Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> > > 22 Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> > > 19 Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> > > 12 Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> > > 11 Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> > > 9 Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> > > 8 Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > 7 Reported-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> > > 7 Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > > 7 Acked-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> > > 6 Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> > > 6 Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> > > 5 Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> > > 5 Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> > > 4 Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> > > 4 Reviewed-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > > 4 Helped-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> > > 4 Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> > > 3 Reviewed-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> > > 3 Reviewed-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> > > > > (There does not appear to be enough density here to make a useful > > metric.) > > If your database keeps mail relationship (e.g. what mail is replied to > what according to In-Reply-To header) then look for mail replies to > patches. I think we have a rough picture who are active reviewers with > that.
Not really, as there is a high percentage of "on a tangent" replies in many, many patch threads.
Ciao, Dscho