git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Problems rebasing branch after renaming files

From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date
Feb 27, 2009, 10:55 UTC
Message-ID
<m3hc2gup2n.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To
<c64207c00902270055q57442e2dmd81c197419dda71a@mail.gmail.com>
Salvatore Iovene <salvatore.iovene@googlemail.com> writes:
> Hi list,
> I ran into a problem, and I'm unsure it's a git bug or a misuse of mine.
[...]
> 3) Create branch B and work on it. In this branch, rename a directory
> containing source files with git-mv
> 4) Merge B to master
> 5) Rebase A to master
[...]
Show 11 quoted lines
> I found that, checking out A, my files in the now renamed directories
> are as the were in B, i.e. not including the changes made in A,
> because I have rebased A to master and git didn't realize that the
> files in old_directory_name are the same as in new_directory_name so
> they should have been merged.
> 
> Either this is a git bug or not, can anyone suggest a way to fix this?
> All I've thought so far is to git-format-patch the patches that I had
> in A, use sed to replace the old_directory_name with the new one,
> create a new branch called A2 at master's head, apply the patches
> there and git-branch -D A.

In short: you have rename in mainline, and want to rebase branch from before rename.

This problem is not bug in git, it is rather limitation of default patch based rebase. The git-format-patch | git-am pipeline is fast, but it cannot deal with renames in mainline. You have to use merge-based rebase, i.e. use

  $ git rebase --merge <upstream>
>From git-rebase(1):
  -m, --merge
    Use merging strategies to rebase. When the recursive (default) merge
    strategy is used, this allows rebase to be aware of renames  on  the
    upstream side.
  -s <strategy>, --strategy=<strategy>
    Use  the  given  merge  strategy;  can be supplied more than once to
    specify them in the order they should be tried. If there  is  no  -s
    option, a built-in list of strategies is used instead
    (git-merge-recursive when merging a single head, git-merge-octopus
    otherwise). This implies --merge.
Or use "git rebase --interactive".
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
Previous: Salvatore Iovene
Message 2 of 2 in “Problems rebasing branch after renaming files”
  1. Salvatore IoveneFeb 27, 2009
  2. Jakub NarebskiFeb 27, 2009

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.