Re: Stacked GIT 0.3 (now more Quilt-like)
- From
- Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com>
- Date
- Jul 7, 2005, 19:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m38y0ictno.fsf@telia.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1120683255.6881.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 14:32 +0200, Peter Osterlund wrote: > > I agree with the other comments, it's probably not wise to rely on > > wiggle, and wiggle sometimes makes a mess. However, it often does the > > right thing, and with a configurable merge program and an undo > > function, this should not be a problem. Just undo and try again if you > > don't like the result. > > In the today's snapshot you can get the 'stg push --undo' command which > reverts the result of a push operation (either failed or not). The patch > is reverted to its previous state. It works even if you ran 'refresh'.
Thanks, this seems to work as expected.
Show 6 quoted lines
> The current implementation does not remove the .older/.local/.remote > files from the tree when undoing a push. I think I will first implement > a 'resolve' command which takes care of these files. > > Anyway, once I fully test the current state of stgit, I will make the > 0.4 release (probably this weekend).
I've found an unrelated problem. If I export patches with "stg export dirname", there are no diffs included in the patches. The patch description is all that is generated. If I omit the dirname parameter, the export works correctly though.
-- Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com http://web.telia.com/~u89404340