Re: [RFC] Zit: the git-based single file content tracker
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 24, 2008, 10:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m38wsei8ne.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <cb7bb73a0810232355u6de0479cyc260c80227f44e59@mail.gmail.com>
"Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > If you decide against a shared repository, maybe you want to > > consider to not use ".zit.file/", but ".zit/file/" as the > > repository? This would reduce the clutter to a single directory, > > just like with ".git". And moving files around wouldn't be that > > much complicated. > > Right. I'll give that a shot.
By the way RCS which I use for version control of single files use both approaches: it can store 'file,v' alongside 'file' (just like your '.zit.file/' or '.file.git/'), but it can also store files on per-directory basis in 'RCS/' subdirectory (proposed '.zit/file/' or '.zit/file.git/' solution)
By the way, it would be nice to have VC interface for Emacs for Zit...
-- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git