Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2011, #07; Wed, 27)
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2011, 19:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m37haew4io.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1v0n75rj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2011, #07; Wed, 27)
> -------------------------------------------------- > [New Topics]
Show 5 quoted lines
> * ft/gitweb-tar-with-gzip-n (2011-04-26) 1 commit > (merged to 'next' on 2011-04-26 at 8e59a0e) > + gitweb: supply '-n' to gzip for identical output > > Will merge to "master" by the end of week #2.
Nice.
Show 20 quoted lines
> -------------------------------------------------- > [Stalled] > > * jn/gitweb-js (2011-04-15) 13 commits > - gitweb: Make JavaScript ability to adjust timezones configurable > - gitweb.js: Add UI for selecting common timezone to display dates > - gitweb: JavaScript ability to adjust time based on timezone > - gitweb: Unify the way long timestamp is displayed > - gitweb: Refactor generating of long dates into format_timestamp_html > - gitweb.js: Provide getElementsByClassName method (if it not exists) > - gitweb.js: Introduce gitweb/static/js/lib/cookies.js > - gitweb.js: Extract and improve datetime handling > - gitweb.js: Provide default values for padding in padLeftStr and padLeft > - gitweb.js: Update and improve comments in JavaScript files > - gitweb: Split JavaScript for maintability, combining on build > - Remove gitweb/gitweb.cgi and other legacy targets from main Makefile > - git-instaweb: Simplify build dependency on gitweb > > I do not recall seeing this series much reviewed. Is everybody happy with > this series?
I have just resend this series in cleaned up form, containing all the fixes and extra patches; in fact nearly the same as 'jn/gitweb-js' branch. It includes comparison to J.H. patch.
I think it addresses all the issues Kevin and you found with previous versions; I haven't heard from J.H. yet.
-- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git