Re: Commiting changes onto more than one branch
- From
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
- Date
- Nov 25, 2009, 23:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m2pr76jh00.fsf@igel.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LNX.2.00.0911251752330.14365@iabervon.org>
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> writes:
> (The temporary branch is only needed at all so that the developer has > some way to refer to the fix while merging it, and the name only > matters in that humans will see it in the merge commit message.)
If you merge by commit-ish the branch name does not even appear in the commit message.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."