Re: Question about "git pull --rebase"

> Francis Moreau schreef:
>> hello,
>>
>> Let's say I'm on a branch called 'foo'.
>>
>> I tried to rebase this branch by using 'git pull --rebase'.
>>
>> I first tried the following command:
>>
>>     $ git pull --rebase origin master:foo
>>     remote: Counting objects: 5, done.
>>     remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
>>     Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done.
>>     From /dev/shm/git/A
>>     ! [rejected]        master     -> foo  (non fast forward)
>
> When using a refspec, you usually mean to update a remote tracking
> branch, like refs/remotes/origin/master. Internally the refspec
> parameter is passed to git fetch, which fast-forwards your local
> tracking branch to match the remote branch.
>
> With this command, you make git clear you want to fast-forward your
> branch refs/foo to match the remotes master branch, and then rebase
> your current branch on that foo branch.
>
> Foo probably is also your current branch. So what you probably want is
> to fetch the remotes master branch and rebase your current branch foo
> on it. You could do it this way:
>
>> Then I tried:
>>
>>     $ git pull --rebase origin master
>>
>> which worked.
>
> This does not update any remote tracking branches, but it will rebase
> your foo branch on the remote master branch (which is what you want)
> It could also be done with:
>
> git pull --rebase origin master:origin/master
>
> This will also update your remote tracking branch
> refs/remotes/origin/master to match the master branch on the remote
> repo. Your foo branch will then be rebased onto it.
>
>>
>> Reading the man git-pull I would assume the 2 commands are equivalent
>> but obviously they're not.
>>
>> So the question is: why ?
>
> So, thats why :) They're not the same. Many words... Hope you
> understand... I hope I understood it well too..?
>