Re: Bisecting through the middle of a big merge?
- From
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
- Date
- Jan 28, 2012, 08:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m239b0fbpb.fsf@igel.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <jfve09$ih5$1@dough.gmane.org>
walt <w41ter@gmail.com> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> There are many individual commits from Tejun Heo et al included > in that one big commit from Linus. Unfortunately for me, some of > those commits cause other problems that I'm not trying to bisect; > other problems that evidently get fixed by other commits in the > same big merge. > > So I do 'git bisect skip' six or eight times until the 'false' bug > goes away, and that leaves me at the end of the bisect without finding > the individual commit that's causing my 'real' bug. > > How do you experts handle this kind of problem?
If you can identify the commit that fixes the unrelated problem you can try to cherry-pick it during the bisect.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."