Re: [PATCH v1] gpg-interface: Signatures by expired keys are fine
- From
- Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2026, 09:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <lroixebbcfnbr6qcaj5oznvl5c5gwusbzzznev5zllhnta2zj4@zkoypgor7g6e>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqa4xonqs5.fsf@gitster.g>
Hello Junio,
On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 01:27:06PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org> writes: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 09:26:09AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Makes sense; I'll wrap this overlong line while queuing, though. > > > > Just to be sure: That means I don't resent with the typo fixed and an > > additional line break and you care to apply this patch? > > Unless there are other things you want to update, no need to resend. > > FYI, here is what I queued. > > ---- >8 ---- > From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org> > Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 16:23:06 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] gpg-interface: signatures by expired keys are fine > > [...]
LGTM, thanks!
Best regards Uwe