Re: fsck missing dangling commits that are candidate heads?
- From
- Sergio Callegari <scallegari@arces.unibo.it>
- Date
- Apr 4, 2007, 13:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <loom.20070404T152916-290@post.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <loom.20070403T215123-220@post.gmane.org>
Sergio Callegari <scallegari <at> arces.unibo.it> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Many thanks! I was quite sure I was missing something... > At least I am in good company since the fsck man page does not mention the > logs > > Then... is there any shorthand for finding candidate branch-heads (i.e. for > having something like fsck without looking at the logs) ? >
I mean, so that git lost-found can take advantage of it... in fact git gc is surely doing the right thing by considering reflogs, but probably git lost-found should not (at least wrt its documentation this script appears to be not in its best shape right now).
Sergio