Re: How do I get the contents of a directory in fast-import
- From
- Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2016, 01:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <jwvd1t270zv.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.version-control.git@gnu.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160115223922.GB32081@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Show 6 quoted lines
>> So how do I get a directory listing from fast-import, i.e. >> like I can get with "git cat-file -p", but without having to fork >> a separate git process? > I'm not sure I understand your use case exactly, but is the directory > listing you want part of the newly-added objects from fast-import, or > does it already exist in the branches you are collecting from?
For the most important cases, the relevant revision already exists before fast-import, yes.
> If the latter, I wonder if a separate "cat-file --batch" process could > give you what you need (it's a separate process, but you can start a
I'm not sure exactly how "git cat-file --batch" works internally (whether it tries to keep active revisions, like fast-import does), but I've indeed used it successfully (tho for files).
> single process and make many queries of it; I assume your desire not to > add an extra process is to avoid the overhead).
The overhead of starting a new process is one part, but another is the overhead of re-reading the refs (I can have tens of thousands of branches in my repository), etc..
> But I think it won't pretty-print trees for you; it will give you the > raw tree data
Indeed.
> (which I imagine is what you are getting from cat-blob, too).
Actually no, "cat-blob" gives an error instead:
fatal: Object 2ca1672d50c9dbfe582dc53af3c7ce9891a7a664 is a tree but a blob was expected.
> I'm not sure that's actually documented anywhere (it was part of > the original revisions of git, and hasn't changed since). But it is > basically:
Show 7 quoted lines
> tree = tree_entry*
> tree_entry = mode SP path NUL sha1
> mode = ascii mode, in octal (e.g., "100644")
> path = <any byte except NUL>*
> sha1 = <any byte>{20}
> SP = ascii space (0x20)
> NUL = 0-byteAh, thanks. It'd be great if cat-blob could return this instead of signalling an error.
> So it is pretty simple to parse.
My program is written in /bin/sh so parsing the above is actually rather inconvenient, but it's much better than just getting an error.
Stefan