Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] patch-id: replace `atoi()` with `strtoi_with_tail()`

From: Mohit Marathe <mohitmarathe@proton.me>
Date: Mar 14, 2024, 10:22 UTC
Message-ID: <jnBS0qo8QZFzqzU38VOg0t-BVquGuzjDdY820B8DW1uCd70FAetOik5rSV01nzSidyMqIPbarZ7lL9JNra-hR8Xzdfv9ZLcLI9wU3nyVgrI=@proton.me>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq34st1bhh.fsf@gitster.g>

Show 9 quoted lines

> Mohit Marathe mohitmarathe@proton.me writes:
> 
> > I am writing to inquire about the status of this patch.
> 
> 
> Thanks for pinging.
> 
> Please be kind to fellow project members by including a URL under
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/ to the original discussion. In general

I thought replying in the same thread as that of patch would be enough. But now that I think about it, threads can get pretty long. My bad,I will keep in mind to include the URL of the patch next time.

Just for the record, I was talking about this patch: https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1646.v6.git.1707025718.gitgitgadget @gmail.com/

Show 7 quoted lines

> there needs to be a reason why a patch should be applied, but a lack
> of reason why a patch should be applied is good enough reason why a
> patch may not have been applied so far. I cannot offhand recall
> what problems the patch had or if there were additional problems in
> the patch that was left unaddressed.
> 
> Thanks.

This makes perfect sense. Thanks for clarifying.

Thanks.