Re: Groups of commits
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2010, 12:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <i2k32541b131004280546j5fc4e160oa1618fe14d83a291@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <y2t81b0412b1004280105p46962bdeq163bc4fb92cb0fdb@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 07:25, Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> wrote: >> Just to add to the "merge in topic branches" idea - if you find that >> the commits are trivially fast-forwardable, you can still add a short >> note/cover letter with >> >> git merge --no-ff -m "Added in foo's work" <branch/commit> > > Except that is not a "short note" anymore, but a full-fledged merge > commit. You forced it with "--no-ff".
I think it's safe to say that a commit *is* just a "short note" about a tree, who made it, the reason (message), and who its parents were.
Have fun,
Avery