Re: Pushing to GitHub doesn't push all branches
- From
Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 10, 2009, 15:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <h37lh2$q3s$1@ger.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4A575416.2090304@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > You really mirrored your repo: All your "lost" branches are remotes on > the github side as well. That has two consequences:
The two branches that are of most importance to me, is "trunk" and "fixes_2_2" as found in the SubVersion repository.
refs/remotes/trunk refs/remotes/fixes_2_2
So should I have only pushed the above mentioned branches, but as "true" heads in GitHub. Geesh, I hope I am understanding what I am typing, because I feel a bit lost now. :-)
Is there any way to clean up the mess available on GitGub? So that 'git ls-remote ...' will only show the real remotes.... Or should there be no remotes on GitHub?
Sorry, I'm fairly new to Git and it feels like I jumped into the deap end here. ;-)
> (assuming there are only svn branches) into proper heads on github, i.e. > a refspec like '+refs/remotes/*:refs/*' for your pushes.
I'll read the man pages on what that refspec means... If I manage to only push 'trunk' which is master under git and 'fixes_2_2' which will be some other name under git, how to I keep both those in sync with the SubVersion repository.
At the moment I have a cronjob that executes the following every 30 minutes. ==================== cd /mnt/samba/git/fpc.git/ $GIT checkout master $GIT svn rebase $GIT gc --auto $GIT push origin master ====================
Does 'git svn rebase' get all branch or does it just update "master" (Trunk from SubVersion)?
I apologise for all the questions...
Regards, - Graeme -
-- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/