Re: cogito remote branch

From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 10, 2007, 11:52 UTC
Message-ID: <fh4627$men$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711101217130.4330@castor.milkiway.cos>

Michael Dressel wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines

> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Jon Loeliger wrote: 
>> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 10:10, MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de wrote:
>>
>>>  There are just some features
>>> which simplify things for me in cogito. E.g. in cogito in the simplest
>>> way you don't need to be aware of the index. While with git
>>> you have to remember to add the changes to the index explicitly
>>> to get them committed. 
>> 
>> "git commit -a ..." might be useful for you.
>> 
>> Other lingering cogito-isms you think are lacking in git?
> 
> Thanks for the hint. I have to use git for a while to understand what may 
> still be lacking (at least for me, if at all). Off the top of my head one 
> other difference is that if I do a cg-push the remote (or origin) head is 
> updated automatically, I think.

If you mean that tracking branches are updated on push, this is what git also does from some time (perhaps not in released version, so please wait or run 'master').

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git