Re: [WIP] Get rid of msys in favor of busybox port for windows
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 10, 2007, 16:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fcaeb9bf0707100912y69d1f406waf094e5f68e36ada@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87eacd830707100856l3132bee2k45b8d59ac1875d89@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/10/07, Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On 7/10/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm integrating some code from busybox to mingw tree so that mingw > > port can work without msys. Posix utilities such as sed, awk, head, > > tail... seem to work well. The main obstacle is ash, which is no where > > near usable state (fork issues as always). Busybox ash is about 13000 > > lines of code, not too big. > > > > Anyone interested in? > If I can use it without needing a "vi/vim" implementation I'm interested !
There is no vi/vim in the port :-) My goal is to make shell scripts work with minimum effort. I don't even attempt to make ash interactively usable (well, git add --interactive and friends have to wait longer).
-- Duy