Re: [PATCH 1/5] submodule foreach: correct '$path' in nested submodules from a subdirectory
- From
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2018, 13:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <f8c0fb71-4bb1-3793-76ef-1052e739849b@ramsayjones.plus.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180503005358.89082-2-sbeller@google.com>
On 03/05/18 01:53, Stefan Beller wrote:
Show 34 quoted lines
> From: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com>
>
> When running 'git submodule foreach --recursive' from a subdirectory of
> your repository, nested submodules get a bogus value for $path:
> For a submodule 'sub' that contains a nested submodule 'nested',
> running 'git -C dir submodule foreach echo $path' from the root of the
> superproject would report path='../nested' for the nested submodule.
> The first part '../' is derived from the logic computing the relative
> path from $pwd to the root of the superproject. The second part is the
> submodule path inside the submodule. This value is of little use and is
> hard to document.
>
> There are three different possible solutions that have more value:
> (a) The path value is documented as the path from the toplevel of the
> superproject to the mount point of the submodule. If 'the' refers to
> the superproject holding this submodule ('sub' holding 'nested'),
> the path would be expected to be path='nested'.
> (b) In case 'the' superproject is referring to the toplevel, which
> is the superproject in which the original command was invoked,
> then path is expected to be path='sub/nested'.
> (c) The documentation explains $path as [...] "relative to the
> superproject", following 091a6eb0fe (submodule: drop the
> top-level requirement, 2013-06-16), such that the nested submodule
> would be expected as path='../sub/nested', when "the" superproject
> is the superproject, where the command was run from
> (d) or the value of path='nested' is expected if we take the
> intermediate superproject into account. [This is the same as
> (a); it highlights that the documentation is not clear, but
> technically correct if we were to revert 091a6eb0fe.]
>
> The behavior for (c) was introduced in 091a6eb0fe (submodule: drop the
> top-level requirement, 2013-06-16) the intent for $path seemed to be
> relative to $cwd to the submodule worktree, but that did not work for
> nested submodules, as the intermittent submodules were not included in----------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^ intermediate
ATB, Ramsay Jones