Re: A simpler approach to tracking directories (was: The philosophy behind my directory proposal in a nutshell)
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 22, 2007, 18:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <f806bb$ib1$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070722175731.GA16658@thunk.org>
Theodore Tso wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Another way of putting is this single bit of information meaning "keep > this directory around when empty" is something that ***must*** be > representable in three different places: in a git tree object, in the > index, *AND* in the working tree. The problem with "." is that since > all directories contain the "." entry, you can't represent the bit of > information you want to record in the working tree in that way.
I don't think the "do not delete when empty" bit must be somehow represented in the working directory. It is enough to have this bit in index to deal with working directory, and in the repository to have it persistent.
Compare with submodules, and with unmerged entries (which sometimes do not have worktree representation).
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git