Re: Test failures on 'pu' branch

From: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Date: Nov 8, 2017, 22:10 UTC
Message-ID: <f61cff3c-0d2e-4d6d-4db3-3b419246a760@jeffhostetler.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kb3NpuWW=BpTjF_DrdVhXHh3d_8aF77Jdpi+8yTxtAbVw@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/8/2017 3:36 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines

> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Ramsay Jones
> <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> wrote:
> 
>> t5300-pack-object.sh                             (Wstat: 256 Tests: 40 Failed: 2)
> 
>> t5500-fetch-pack.sh                              (Wstat: 256 Tests: 355 Failed: 6)
> 
> These are series
> 
>> t5601-clone.sh                                   (Wstat: 256 Tests: 102 Failed: 4)
> 
> This one is a spurious test. I had that flake on me once in the last weeks, too.
> But upon investigation I could not reproduce.
> See https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqq376ipdpx.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/
>

I suspect that the failures related to the jh/partial-clone-* branches are probably due to slight differences between yesterday's part-1 and last week's version of part-2 and part-3.

I'm going to be on vacation until Monday, so can we just pull those parts out of 'pu' until I can get you new versions of parts 2 and 3 ?

Thanks Jeff